BMW Garage BMW Meets Register Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   6Post.com | BMW 6-Series Forum > BMW 6 Series Forum > BMW M6 Forum (F12 / F13)

Post Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
      08-30-2012, 08:58 AM   #1
Jason
Administrator
Jason's Avatar
United_States
6689
Rep
16,674
Posts

 
Drives: E90 M3
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: USA

iTrader: (0)

Post Autoexpress Video Comparo: 2013 BMW M6 Convertible versus 2013 SL63 AMG

BIMMERPOST NEWS
Autoexpress Video Comparo: 2013 BMW M6 versus 2013 SL63 AMG
47
COMMENTS

Autoexpress puts two potent German convertibles to the test - the 2013 M6 Convertible (F12) against the 2013 Mercedes SL63 AMG.

On paper, the F12 M6 features a 4.4L V8 pushing 560hp/680 Nm torque [all specs], while the SL63 is powered by a 5.4L V8 with 556hp/800 Nm torque.

The 2013 M6 convertible carries an MSRP of $113,995 in the US, compared to the SL63's sticker price of $146,695. Watch Autexpress' impressions below.


Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:14 AM   #2
Rich@GTBPerformance
Bimmerpost Sponsor and BMW Performance Guru
Rich@GTBPerformance's Avatar
226
Rep
4,409
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 E92 JZB M3, 2000 750iL
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: North New Jersey

iTrader: (20)

Not what I was expecting... Interesting!
__________________
Email : rich@gtbperformance.com | Web : www.gtbperformance.com | Tel : 973 429 2839



GTB Performance is a supporting member of Bimmerpost and the BMW Car Club of America, NJ Chapter
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:22 AM   #3
jettie1767
First Lieutenant
United_States
6
Rep
331
Posts

 
Drives: '14 M6 GC - Tanzanite Blue
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Colts Neck, NJ

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
Send a message via AIM to jettie1767 Send a message via Yahoo to jettie1767 Send a message via Skype™ to jettie1767
Good review but they aren't the same type cars. One is a 4-seat GT and the other one is a 2-seat Roadster.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:26 AM   #4
realtrevor
Registered
0
Rep
1
Posts

 
Drives: 2006 E87 116i
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Jhb

iTrader: (0)

Obvious results.

Nice review, I was expecting the results to be like that. I still feel like he M6 convertible's direct competitor would be the E63 Convertible if it was available.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:33 AM   #5
SlammedR8
Brigadier General
SlammedR8's Avatar
Canada
118
Rep
4,937
Posts

 
Drives: 2010 Audi R8 V10 +2013 Audi S4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to SlammedR8
ouch! M6 got spanked
__________________
2010 Audi R8 V10 Coupe 6MT-White on Red
GMG Exhaust | H&R Springs | H&R Spacers | Carbonio Intake | UniTronic ECU Upgrade| 15% Tints/50% Windshield|LED License Plate
2013 Range Rover Sport-Black on Black
Stock with 15% Tint & 50% Windshield
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:34 AM   #6
SlammedR8
Brigadier General
SlammedR8's Avatar
Canada
118
Rep
4,937
Posts

 
Drives: 2010 Audi R8 V10 +2013 Audi S4
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto

iTrader: (2)

Send a message via MSN to SlammedR8
Quote:
Originally Posted by jettie1767 View Post
Good review but they aren't the same type cars. One is a 4-seat GT and the other one is a 2-seat Roadster.
you are right, if the M6 was a seat roadster with that engine and all the awesome ///M engineering it has... it would be the winner for sure!
__________________
2010 Audi R8 V10 Coupe 6MT-White on Red
GMG Exhaust | H&R Springs | H&R Spacers | Carbonio Intake | UniTronic ECU Upgrade| 15% Tints/50% Windshield|LED License Plate
2013 Range Rover Sport-Black on Black
Stock with 15% Tint & 50% Windshield
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:39 AM   #7
cs4444
Private First Class
cs4444's Avatar
United_States
1
Rep
178
Posts

 
Drives: BMW
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Philadelphia

iTrader: (0)

The M6 did incredibly well considering it can seat 4, weighs more, and has a much longer wheelbase. The Sl only seats two, has 200Nm more torque, and was equipped with carbon ceramic brakes.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 09:56 AM   #8
aantar
Enlisted Member
aantar's Avatar
0
Rep
33
Posts

 
Drives: 2007 E90 330i |1999 E46 323i
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Lebanon

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2007 E90 330i  [0.00]
1999 E46 323i  [0.00]
0-60 in 5.3 sec ?? LOL !
__________________
2007 E90 330i - 272 bhp | 1999 E46 323i - 170 bhp

Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 10:17 AM   #9
ZheHbKa
Lieutenant Colonel
ZheHbKa's Avatar
Russian Federation
22
Rep
1,795
Posts

 
Drives: the Wind
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: NYC

iTrader: (0)

Garage List
2014 BMW 335 Xi  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by aantar View Post
0-60 in 5.3 sec ?? LOL !
LOL! this is not even 650 vert numbers....

m5 does 0 - 60 in 3.6 so m6 should be a hairline quicker or at least the same, so vert is under 4s, prob in 3.9 range
__________________
2014 F30 335 X-Drive | 6-MT | Alpine White/Coral Red | ZMM ZDH ZDA |

Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 10:25 AM   #10
HotIce
Banned
United_States
29
Rep
445
Posts

 
Drives: 2013 BMW M3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: I'm not telling some creeper where I live!

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlammedM6 View Post
you are right, if the M6 was a seat roadster with that engine and all the awesome ///M engineering it has... it would be the winner for sure!
Yup. 2 tons of ///M engineering. Awesome.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 10:37 AM   #11
coolhandshin
Private
South Korea
2
Rep
59
Posts

 
Drives: '08 528i, '11 650i Conv.
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Seoul

iTrader: (0)

1. Incredible how he can speak so much while driving so intensively.


2. Tone of his voice is so calm (and no fun) when driving the Merc.
(Maybe because it was driven after the BMW so he got used to the torque.)


3. Both cars are just so beautiful gorgeous.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 10:58 AM   #12
ucla1995
Slow and low
16
Rep
636
Posts

 
Drives: M5
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: USA

iTrader: (2)

Quote:
Originally Posted by SlammedM6 View Post
ouch! M6 got spanked
+1
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 11:10 AM   #13
E60orBust
Captain
United_States
15
Rep
670
Posts

 
Drives: "The Brothers //M-Sport" E90/2
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MD

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by coolhandshin View Post
1. Incredible how he can speak so much while driving so intensively.
Exactly what I was thinking. That guy rolls it like an auction judge: "Do I hear 45, 45, 45: 45 up front, 50, 50: 50 down in the back"!!

Reminds me a lot of Tiff with how he instantly verbalized every bit of the driving experience.
__________________
Down for Maintenance
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 11:10 AM   #14
raduslaf
Enlisted Member
Bulgaria
0
Rep
37
Posts

 
Drives: E46 325i sedan
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Bulgaria

iTrader: (0)

The guy said 556 bhp for the Merc, not 537.So - more power, less weight.Not spanked at all if you ask me Put that engine into a z4 and see the results
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 11:33 AM   #15
Daft
Captain
Daft's Avatar
Canada
29
Rep
892
Posts

 
Drives: 2011 ZCP E92 M3 & 2003 E46 M3
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada

iTrader: (1)

Garage List
2011 BMW M3  [4.87]
2003 BMW M3  [5.00]
Quote:
Originally Posted by jettie1767 View Post
Good review but they aren't the same type cars. One is a 4-seat GT and the other one is a 2-seat Roadster.
This.
__________________

2011 M3 ZCP | ESS SUPERCHARGED | AKRAPOVIC EVOLUTION | 20" HRE P40 | BREMBO BBK | B&G SPRINGS
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 11:46 AM   #16
sonicbimmer19
Lieutenant
12
Rep
481
Posts

 
Drives: E88 and F32
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Los Angeles, CA

iTrader: (1)

SL AMG and M6 aren't even comparable cars haha

M6 should be compared to E class AMG
And SL AMG should be comparable to non-existent Z8M (Are you reading this BMW? Haha)

Bmw needs Z8 and a true super car like M10 which I'm hoping to see after i8 in by the end of 2010's
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 12:20 PM   #17
EdM5
Major
EdM5's Avatar
Netherlands
27
Rep
1,417
Posts

 
Drives: F10 M5 CP & E70 X5 Xdrive35d
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Amsterdam

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by jettie1767 View Post
Good review but they aren't the same type cars. One is a 4-seat GT and the other one is a 2-seat Roadster.
Yeah, therefore a pretty lame comparo.
__________________
2004 e87 118d (ret.), 2006 e92 335d (ret.), 2007 e92 330d (ret.), 2007 e87 130i M-sport (ret.), 2009 e92 M3 (ret.), 2010 f10 535d M-sport (ret.)
2009 e70 X5 35d & 2014 f10 M5 CP
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 12:59 PM   #18
alexey21
Lieutenant
10
Rep
409
Posts

 
Drives: Turbo
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Philly

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZheHbKa View Post
LOL! this is not even 650 vert numbers....

m5 does 0 - 60 in 3.6 so m6 should be a hairline quicker or at least the same, so vert is under 4s, prob in 3.9 range
I thought i miss heard it the first 10 times i replayed that part.

I dont think this review can be any accurate if they cant even mention the proper 0-60 time.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 01:33 PM   #19
philsteroni
Private First Class
Canada
1
Rep
144
Posts

 
Drives: 325xi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Montreal

iTrader: (1)

So let me get this straight. The BMW makes almost equal horsepower with a litre less of engine displacement. It has a better transmission and costs 30 000+$ less. It weighs more, lacks ceramic brakes and has 2 extra seats, which resulted in the BMW losing the comparison for lapping the track a second slower. Something seems off...
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 01:44 PM   #20
TheBingoBalls
Lieutenant Colonel
Canada
19
Rep
1,815
Posts

 
Drives: E90 325i, R56 MINI Cooper
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Toronto, Ontario

iTrader: (1)

Quote:
Originally Posted by philsteroni View Post
So let me get this straight. The BMW makes almost equal horsepower with a litre less of engine displacement. It has a better transmission and costs 30 000+$ less. It weighs more, lacks ceramic brakes and has 2 extra seats, which resulted in the BMW losing the comparison for lapping the track a second slower. Something seems off...
That's what I'm saying...1 second slower. Laughable given it's weight issues.
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 01:49 PM   #21
Judah
First Lieutenant
4
Rep
360
Posts

 
Drives: Black E46 M3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: New Jeru

iTrader: (0)

Quote:
Originally Posted by philsteroni
So let me get this straight. The BMW makes almost equal horsepower with a litre less of engine displacement. It has a better transmission and costs 30 000+$ less. It weighs more, lacks ceramic brakes and has 2 extra seats, which resulted in the BMW losing the comparison for lapping the track a second slower. Something seems off...
Yes, Mercedes pricing structure .... :
Appreciate 0
      08-30-2012, 03:30 PM   #22
UCFJWH
Enlisted Member
1
Rep
31
Posts

 
Drives: Audi S5
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Orlando, FL

iTrader: (0)

I would think upgrading the M to the Ceramic brakes would make up that second.
Appreciate 0
Post Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.




6post.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
1Addicts.com, BIMMERPOST.com, E90Post.com, F30Post.com, M3Post.com, ZPost.com, 5Post.com, 6Post.com, 7Post.com, XBimmers.com logo and trademark are properties of BIMMERPOST