Quote:
Originally Posted by Tambohamilton
Fair enough, you're absolutely right.
Supposing they do fix it and somehow all is good, can you still lemon it subsequently, based on what's happened so far?
|
Based on my conversation with the law firm, it is but a foregone conclusion. The only options for GM now is to buy the car back, or offer me some sort of settlement that satisfies me.
The law is on my side.
Fact is, GM did make a settlement offer. They offered me $xx,xxx, in exchange I keep the car, it never goes into buy-back, title never exchange hands. That’s all well and good, if they chose to repair the car promptly and fix it right in the first place.
Instead, it took them 3 months to authorize a repair by simply replacing the bearing, crank, and a couple of pistons and pretend that solved the issue. Had they swapped with a new engine, and got it all done say, just a hair past the 30 cumulative days in the shop, I might have been compelled to mull over said offer.
Instead, they chose the most asinine way of “fixing” the car and continue to skirt their obligations. So at this point I’m demanding the car be fixed and fixed right, AND also exercise my right under the law by demanding they buy the car back.
I don’t think I’m being unreasonable, right?