04-19-2014, 01:56 PM | #45 |
Major General
1125
Rep 6,072
Posts |
For sure S63 is slower than E63 because is several hundred pounds heavier
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-19-2014, 02:08 PM | #46 | |
Major
1089
Rep 1,149
Posts |
Quote:
watch that. and thats only the m6 gran coupe. the m6 destorys the e63 and cls. and the s63 wont be its too heavy. its 0to60 time is only 4.2 - 4.4sec M6 does it in 3.7 easy. My uncle took his M6 GC to vmax and dragged a sl63 the sl63 had no chance only thing it saw was the beautiful taillights of the GC. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2014, 05:49 PM | #49 |
Lieutenant Colonel
170
Rep 1,958
Posts |
Not quite. Whilst the 4wd version will be better from a standstill, once actually hooked up the 4wd version will be slower as it'll have higher transmission losses. So, on a straight that long, the M6 would likely pull out an even bigger lead.
|
Appreciate
0
|
04-27-2014, 05:56 PM | #50 |
Major General
1125
Rep 6,072
Posts |
I was talking about 1/4 mile which is not that long. Your statement is valid for long distances like 1 mile.
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|