Dyno'ed M6 on dynojet

[LSM]

My car has charcoal filters removed Nothing else

[TunedM2C]

Well, looks like your fill ups from now on are going to be a bit more expensive. Lol

[gmd2003]

Originally Posted by LSM

Yea exactly....there's no baseline though on this dyno, so who knows...just thought would post results from dynojet...

Different dyno ( different type of dyno too) , different calibration , different conditions etc . Dynojets read high , certainly much higher than Mustang dyno's too , so without a baseline this doesn't mean anything to be honest . But given how the BMS works by increasing boost beyond whats tuned and fueled for , 100 octane will keep the ECU from pulling as much timing and you will make more power .

[mr-karim]

Not bad at all!
If you have access to 100 octane, then change the PSI level to +3, and 630WHP should be doable.

[Twitch Massacre]

This looks a bit better.

[turbo8765]

It would be interesting to do before and after race gas dyno's on a stock M6.

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by gmd2003

Different dyno ( different type of dyno too)

A dynojet in an inertia dyno, anyone should expect to see higher numbers compared to the mustang.

[Hunter5179]

Nice

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by LSM

I am just posting my results from the dynojet which I am very happy with.

Which gear did they use?

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by LSM

4th, the first two runs we tried there was major wheel slipping. The last run which I posted was the only semi clean run

So it's off, should use as close to 1:1 as possible, and that's 5th on the M6.

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by LSM

Yea I know it's supposed to be 1:1 u do know 5th gear run cant be made because I hit the 155 max speed limiter before 5th gets to redline

Yep, which is why using a Dynojet with an M6 makes zero sense.

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by LSM

Any dyno I run on in 5th will hit max speed limiter before redline

Perhaps, I haven't tried them all. But with a retarder type of dyno (like the Mustang) what data you do get will be a great deal more reliable.

[bjayfan]

Originally Posted by LSM

Mustang I ran previously also in 4th gear ... I am going to go back on mustang in a few weeks it's 60 miles from me

It's about 85 miles for me, so I do understand.

[badblack550xi]

Originally Posted by mr-karim

Not bad at all!
If you have access to 100 octane, then change the PSI level to +3, and 630WHP should be doable.

correction he can run +4 PSI on 100 octane only.

[JoeyLeeBMW]

I think you may have a factory freak!

[turbo8765]

You've posted SAE correction. Do you by chance have the uncorrected graph/number?

[turbo8765]

Copied directly from the dynojet manual… the pdf is available for download via google search.

"Data can either be viewed as measured (“uncorrected”) or corrected to standard atmospheric conditions using WinPEP."

Measured values for hp/trq are greater than corrected values when the DA as measured by the dyno's instruments is less than DA at standard conditions.

Why do I care? The 63tu increases boost to compensate for increased DA to maintain output under less than ideal conditions, therefore raw values should be presented in most cases. Otherwise you may be applying a correction factor when the ECU has already compensated for increased DA.

[LSM]

Originally Posted by turbo8765

Copied directly from the dynojet manual… the pdf is available for download via google search.

"Data can either be viewed as measured (“uncorrected”) or corrected to standard atmospheric conditions using WinPEP."

Measured values for hp/trq are greater than corrected values when the DA as measured by the dyno's instruments is less than DA at standard conditions.

Why do I care? The 63tu increases boost to compensate for increased DA to maintain output under less than ideal conditions, therefore raw values should be presented in most cases. Otherwise you may be applying a correction factor when the ECU has already compensated for increased DA.

I understand but what I am saying is I saw the uncorrected values they were higher. The dyno operator showed me uncorrected was close to 600wheel hp. He said we use sAE as standard on dynojet The one I posted the sAe corrected is lower than the Uncorrected numbers

[SlashM3]

Do u feel the difference with the piggy back?

[gmd2003]

Originally Posted by LSM

With mixed race gas and our premium 91 octane yea I feel a bit of difference nothing major

The problem is I'm sure I would get a significant bump from running race gas with my stock CP tune lol .

[zoltans4]

Originally Posted by gmd2003

The problem is I'm sure I would get a significant bump from running race gas with my stock CP tune lol .

yes, you would (depending on your definition of significant)

[gmd2003]

Originally Posted by LSM

We have 91 octane in Cali I mixed 1/4 tank of 100 octane and 3/4 91....SO the octane was what 93.25.....what everyone else in the country runs

Well not really , most race fuels have anti knock additive packages in them irrespective of their octane . Shell URT adv is an excellent example . It is only rated at 110 octane yet greatly outperforms even 114 octane fuels because of its additive packages . Once you start adding " 1/4 tanks" of race fuel you can't say you have the equivalent of 93 pump .