2015 S63 AMG Coupe...

[M6-Coupe]

Originally Posted by fischer

Mercedes E63 AMG S 4Matic 585PS

0-100km/h - 3,7s
0-200km/h - 11,9s


BMW M6 Competition 575PS

0-100km/h - 3,9s
0-200km/h - 11,2s

Both measures from German car magazines.

A tuned M6 should usually win, if it gets a good start.

For sure S63 is slower than E63 because is several hundred pounds heavier

[YungDro]

Originally Posted by mr-karim

S63 AMG 4 matic S model will be faster than M6, e63 amg 4 matic s beats m6 coupe in a drag...

watch that. and thats only the m6 gran coupe. the m6 destorys the e63 and cls. and the s63 wont be its too heavy. its 0to60 time is only 4.2 - 4.4sec M6 does it in 3.7 easy. My uncle took his M6 GC to vmax and dragged a sl63 the sl63 had no chance only thing it saw was the beautiful taillights of the GC.

[M6-Coupe]

the video is about E63 RWD. the 4 matic one must be faster (drag race) than M6, but I agree with your statement about S63

[AYEDEE]

Man that's classy

[Palmnuts]

Originally Posted by M6-Coupe

the video is about E63 RWD. the 4 matic one must be faster (drag race) than M6, but I agree with your statement about S63

Not quite. Whilst the 4wd version will be better from a standstill, once actually hooked up the 4wd version will be slower as it'll have higher transmission losses. So, on a straight that long, the M6 would likely pull out an even bigger lead.

[M6-Coupe]

Originally Posted by Palmnuts

Not quite. Whilst the 4wd version will be better from a standstill, once actually hooked up the 4wd version will be slower as it'll have higher transmission losses. So, on a straight that long, the M6 would likely pull out an even bigger lead.

I was talking about 1/4 mile which is not that long. Your statement is valid for long distances like 1 mile.