|
Post Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
12-05-2013, 12:07 AM | #45 |
Lieutenant Colonel
81
Rep 1,656
Posts |
+1
It is ridiculous give where credit is due. The GT-R is hell of a performance machine. As for looks.....people need to give it a break.......the GT-R is not a flashy looking car. It is more down to business look. It sort of reminds me of the Bugatti as both are average in looks but fantastically mind blowing in performance.
__________________
nickname"BAD 3",MHD E85 tune,RennArt catback non-resonated exhaust,VRSF Downpipes, VRSF 7"FMIC,VRSF stock side inlets,SSQV BOV,ECS CP,M-performance alcantara steering,retrofit M3 paddle shifters,Alpina B3 tranny flash,AFE power seal CAI,LED angels,ST Coilovers,M3 upper/lower control arms,E93 M3 Front Swaybar ,235/35/19x9 ,275/30/19x9.5. M sport bumpers, CF diffuser. When in doubt..flat out.
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 03:38 AM | #46 | |
Major
112
Rep 1,140
Posts |
Quote:
Saying the competition package is really worth it, because of these measurements ? |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 07:20 AM | #47 | ||
Colonel
352
Rep 2,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
||
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 08:56 AM | #48 |
Private First Class
21
Rep 130
Posts |
Well Cp is really worth it, not only for highspeed on unrestricted "Autobahn" but also for twits etc. Just the sportier package
i only have 2000km on it, and now it is winter brake. Colour frozen brillant White, ceramics, Cp. Changes to make. carbon diffusor ordrerd, aswell mirrors and the Performance exhaust. Will fix it in february.. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 09:51 AM | #49 |
Second Lieutenant
23
Rep 292
Posts |
meh. ..I would take anyone of those other cars over the M6. The other cars offer more performance other than top end speed.
__________________
2015 435i Xdrive Black on Black with loaded
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 10:16 AM | #50 |
Brigadier General
504
Rep 3,446
Posts |
0-300 (186 mph) in 30 seconds is totally off the charts. Few cars can make it to 150 mph that quick.
__________________
See my photography at http://ronscubadiver.wordpress.com
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 11:49 AM | #51 |
Private
6
Rep 73
Posts |
Quote:
Greetings from Bavaria |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 12:51 PM | #52 |
Captain
137
Rep 876
Posts |
Please show me an 09 GT-R which retailed when it first came out for 70k that is 35k. You cant even find them for under 60k unless it has a TON of miles and/or accident history.
__________________
Previous Cars:06 Mazda 3i, 04 Nissan 350z, 08 BMW 335i, 2012 Nissan GT-R, 2016 BMW M4
Current Car: 2017 Acura NSX IG: marcusnc1 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 12:57 PM | #53 |
Captain
137
Rep 876
Posts |
I find it odd that this comparison shows GT-R at 3.1seconds for 0-100KM when its been proven many times it is under a 3 seconds and from the manufacturer it is stated to be below 3 seconds as well
__________________
Previous Cars:06 Mazda 3i, 04 Nissan 350z, 08 BMW 335i, 2012 Nissan GT-R, 2016 BMW M4
Current Car: 2017 Acura NSX IG: marcusnc1 |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 02:27 PM | #54 |
Major General
763
Rep 5,560
Posts |
In US, generally the numbers are somehow optimistic Also they present 0 - 60 times and not the 0 - 62 ones.
M6 is a great all rounder, but it's not a track dedicated car. It's real rivals are way behind it. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 04:48 PM | #55 | |
Colonel
352
Rep 2,176
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 08:49 PM | #56 |
Brigadier General
384
Rep 3,450
Posts |
sorry but i'd pick the dark side.
__________________
"Well, there's a straight-six engine at the front, a manual gearbox in the middle and drive goes to the back. That's Page 1, Chapter 1 from the petrosexual handbook" - JC
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-05-2013, 10:29 PM | #57 | |
Banned
37
Rep 1,312
Posts |
Quote:
The thing you forget is that the 911 turbo actually has significant downforce at speed which the m6 doesn't thus being a more planted car. Downforce slows a car down as you very well know and to be under 30 sec 0-186 is astonishing for a car that has only 560 hp and actually does have downforce. Lets also not forget that the 911 turbo is trapping well over 130 mph whereas the m6 is not even close to that, even though its a fast car. But the track times show you the M6 is really a one trick pony when it comes to performance. Its fast in a straight but fails to deliver the handling, dynamism, precision and feel that only a Porsche car. For those reasons I couldn't see myself ever driving the new m5/m6 in any version, my drives have left me beyond underwhelmed in them save for them being fast. But then again, any 550+ hp car with tons of tq, especially a serious underrate one is going to be a fast car. The M6 has traction issues as is, lower weight would only add to the problem. Panamera Turbo and Turbo S are the same, they are super fast but heavy. If Porsche made a RWD Panamera Turbo S that would probably put up 911 Turbo S type numbers as it already puts down some serious performance and absolutely TROUNCES any BMW M car on the track. Its a full 3 and 5 sec faster than an f10 m5 and m3 on VIR which is an eternity. Last edited by Wolfinwolfsclothing; 12-06-2013 at 06:47 AM.. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2013, 07:42 AM | #58 | |
Major General
763
Rep 5,560
Posts |
Quote:
|
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-06-2013, 10:49 AM | #59 | |
Banned
37
Rep 1,312
Posts |
Quote:
And it's a drivers race with all in a straight, but the pan puts power down with awd much better. |
|
Appreciate
0
|
12-07-2013, 10:28 AM | #60 |
Major General
763
Rep 5,560
Posts |
@wolfinwolfsclothing: the awd cars have an advantage until a certain speed, after that the rwd ones will be in front.
I'm curious to see a 'ring time of an M5/ M6 with Comp Pack against the Panny Turbo S. That is the proper track to understand the driving dynamics of a car. There is a gap of 2,8 sec in this moment. |
Appreciate
0
|
12-20-2013, 05:13 AM | #62 |
Private First Class
4
Rep 135
Posts |
|
Appreciate
0
|
Post Reply |
Bookmarks |
|
|