View Single Post
      07-18-2012, 02:23 AM   #47
Kayani_1
Lieutenant Colonel
Kayani_1's Avatar
United_States
81
Rep
1,656
Posts

Drives: BMW E92/E60
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Houston

iTrader: (1)

How about no rear seats.............I guess in a crunch you will have to make two trips or tell friends to go take a hike.

Also, neither of the 3 are any feather weights. It is like comparing 3 sumo wrestlers and declaring the one that weighs less the winner.

Those that claim whats the big deal....that the two rear seats should not cost more then 40 lbs each in weight. All I have to say is you must have lost your mind fellows. Maybe we should buy you guys two seats and see how easily you would fit them into a SL63 AMG.......wow......I mean seriously.....some people are just talking non sense. It is one thing to criticize but another to bash with ignorance.

The M6 Conv. did not do better in brakes department. It must not have been Ceramic brakes. None the less good win for BMW


Quote:
Originally Posted by 135iDCT View Post
the sl63 should be first... less weight than the elephant m6 , unbelievable torque
__________________
nickname"BAD 3",MHD E85 tune,RennArt catback non-resonated exhaust,VRSF Downpipes, VRSF 7"FMIC,VRSF stock side inlets,SSQV BOV,ECS CP,M-performance alcantara steering,retrofit M3 paddle shifters,Alpina B3 tranny flash,AFE power seal CAI,LED angels,ST Coilovers,M3 upper/lower control arms,E93 M3 Front Swaybar ,235/35/19x9 ,275/30/19x9.5. M sport bumpers, CF diffuser. When in doubt..flat out.

Last edited by Kayani_1; 07-20-2012 at 02:18 AM..
Appreciate 0