Quote:
Originally Posted by BMWFB02
Dude what difference does this all make. Regardless of all you data analysis.. The M6 clearly killed it..
|
well, whats the big point in a car with 553 bhp beating an 473 bhp car FROM A ROLL.
A car thats stated 0-200 1 sec faster than the GT-R (and we know the gt-r is for sure faster in the start due to its AWD so the m6 catches up and beats his time by 1 sec despite the slow start!).
Nothing fabulous there. Just looking at the specs it would have been clear from the beginning... just as is written afterwards, the m6 is 1 sec faster 0-200. Why should it be slower from a roll....
It would be amazing if the 553 bhp heavier car (M6) would beat the 542 bhp lighter car. Where the gt-r in this case is stated to be 1 sec faster 0-200 than the M6.
Dont you think?
a simple look at :
http://fastestlaps.com/comparisons/nissan_gt-r-vs-bmw_m6_2012.html
would already confirm that the M6 is faster than a 2008 Gt-R on the straight line.
So whats the big point in this post?